I'm going to re-write the article from scratch based on the minimal material found in three independent secondary sources I've found. I see that the main author of this version of the article was written by user:Stephen Deken. It also shows that the owner/operator, Stephen Deken, had failed to create any backups. The third source was written by a high school junior but published in a small newspaper, Waco Tribune-Herald, and recounts the sudden end of the service. Two articles have very short mentions of the subject, albeit with some usable facts. Will Beback talk 03:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC) I searched the Proquest newspaper archive. But anything past the intro that isn't sourced should be deleted, based on the principal that all material on Wikipedia should be verifiable. It's survived two AfD, so I won't nominate it again. It's been tagged as lacking any sources since 2009. Equinox ( talk) 16:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Unsourced for six years contribs) 13:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Done Those things are now mentioned.Why is there no mention that the failure of Diary-X was due to the lack of backups being made? - Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.166.226 ( talk Why is there no mention of the controversy over the closure of Diary-X and the loss of so many personal histories? Tim Rhymeless (Er.let's shimmy) 04:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Developer? įrom what I understand, Diary-X was a one-man project, so why no mention of the developer's name anywhere? - hibou 11:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC) November 2006 I don't have anywhere else to vent about it right now, but damn Diary-X! This is sortof painful. The result was no consensus to delete, so the article was kept. The article was nominated again using the same voting page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |